Rothera (Robinhood)
Rothera is Robinhood's own CFTC-regulated event-contract exchange — a venue where contracts are listed and cleared, not a brokerage routing flow elsewhere. That makes it a different animal from the Robinhood (FCM) page, which estimates Robinhood's brokerage business on Kalshi. Here the volume is Rothera's own book, and right now it's almost all sports — World Cup soccer above all.
About this page
Rothera is Robinhood's own regulated event-contract exchange — distinct from the Robinhood brokerage business covered on the Robinhood (FCM) page, which estimates how much Robinhood trades on Kalshi. This page reads Rothera's daily clearing exports directly.
Volume is contract count (one settled contract per unit), summed by day. Categories come from each market's product prefix (e.g. MWC* = World Cup soccer, MLB* = baseball, EC* = economics); the sports split sums sport prefixes against everything else. The exports carry no fee field, so fees are computed per fill from Rothera's trade tape against its published schedule — see Economics, which is why that series starts later than this one. Because this page is end-of-day market data rather than trade prints, it is best for scale and category mix; Trading behavior covers microstructure over the shorter window the tape reaches.
Daily volume
Daily event-contract volume on Rothera since the clearing files began.
Open interest
Contracts still outstanding at each day's close — the standing capital on the book, as opposed to the volume that passed through it.
Why there is no calibration curve on this page
Accuracy & Outcomes asks the sharpest question available: do prices actually predict outcomes? Rothera carries settlement_price and contracts_delivered, and since 2026-07-28 a tape of the prices actually paid, so it looks like it should support the same chart. It is closer than it was, and still not there — for a different reason than before. The measurement is published here so the gap is a documented result rather than a silent omission.
What was measured, and what it ruled out
The outcome side is fine. 3,063 contracts carry a clean binary settlement (a delivery row with settlement_price of exactly 0 or 1), spanning 2026-05-23 to 2026-08-31.
The price side used to be the problem and no longer is. mkt_eod is end-of-day market data with no trade prints, so a full-history axis would have to be an OHLC-derived proxy. But the trades_eod tape now runs from 2026-07-28 to the present, and 92.3% of its 1,657,858 prints land on a contract that has since settled — over that window the x-axis is the price actually paid, not a proxy.
The event count no longer blocks it either — this is what changed. Measured at ten sessions of tape, the prints were 71 independent events and 22–51 per 5-cent bin, with 94.4% of the weight on a single World Cup. Re-measured on 35 sessions: 409 independent settled events, 361–405 in every one of the 20 bins, and the three largest events are only 4.6% of settled contracts. The concentration that made the old curve incoherent is gone, and a curve rebuilt on real prints comes out monotone — 2.16% realised at the bottom band against 95.73% at the top, with a volume-weighted mean error of −1.36¢ and only two bins beyond two standard errors.
What still blocks it is breadth, not size. 399 of those 409 events are MLB games; the rest are three PGA Tour events, three unemployment-claims releases, two inflation releases and two tennis tournaments. A curve drawn on that would be a one-league, one-month measurement wearing a venue's name, and it would say nothing about the soccer that is most of what Rothera has ever traded. The prerequisite is unchanged: continuous tape collection across more leagues, months of it. The counting argument that used to sit here is retired; the breadth argument is what the page now rests on.
One trap survives regardless. On the delivery day the daily close is 0.01 or 0.99 — the outcome itself. Any proxy curve built without excluding settlement-day bars measures its own leakage and will look beautifully calibrated at both ends.
Individual markets
Rothera's individual markets, ranked by volume. Rothera publishes no market names — the feed carries a mnemonic code and nothing else — so this table shows codes and does not dress them up as titles.